Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/VCU expansion

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Virginia Commonwealth University. And merge from history at editorial discretion. Sandstein 17:06, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

VCU expansion

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is just an addendum to an general university article. This article strikes me as a list to promote VCU, which seems like it's content forking. Nominating for deletion on the grounds of WP:NOTPROMOTION and WP:CFORK. Quidster4040 (talk) 23:20, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merge to Virginia Commonwealth University p b p 23:35, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Clean up and Merge to Virginia Commonwealth University, College campuses expand sometimes on a yearly basis. I drive past a college campus on my way to work and they have been doing different construction projects for a few years now. The expansion does not warrant a stand-alone article, though it would be worth noting major construction projects, like any new or upgrades of athletic facilities, new dorms, or new class buildings, in the school page.--Rockchalk717 05:16, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge as Pbp89 suggests. Delete as a second choice. Blythwood (talk) 11:56, 20 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, J 947 03:11, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as promotionalism and spam that we wouldn't want in the main article. This is something you would hand to a donor who you want to name a building, and the minutia in it in terms of expansion would overwhelm the main article, even if done selectively. The fact that a university campus is growing is not out of the norm-- thats what they do to stay relevant and to get donors to give money. If the expansion is really notable it can be covered with 1-2 sentences that are referenced in the main article. No need for a merge. TonyBallioni (talk) 15:17, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.